What ruins a porn scene for you?

[MOW]

Girls spitting on girls - anywhere!

[jblack000]

scenes where they jump back and fourth between two different scenes that are supposed to be happening at the same time but in different places, they are most annoying.

[Sharkhunter]

Originally Posted by Jeff Vader

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Hardcore#Prosecutions

He's done time, and I have little sympathy with him. His movies are at best degrading to women, he just seems to enjoy humiliating them and hurting them. Who watches this crap anyway ?

I have to wonder the same. There must be a small group of people to whom that sort of thing is a turn on, but I don't imagine that they'd be the sort of guy who'd turn up on VEF.

[Sharkhunter]

Another peeve: when a girl is wearing her knickers one moment only for it to jump to a scene where they are nowhere to be seen. I do actually like seeing the fucking take place with the model's knickers either pulled to one side or tight around thighs or ankles, but if she is going to take them off please let us see it - slowly and deliberately if possible.

[cuzzyman927]

Originally Posted by Jeff Vader

I think apart from his ability to get it up on demand, it was the fact that he was not the typical toned gym-bunny male that was part of the appeal ? If this scruffy fat dude can shag women then why can't we ?

(that's a rhetorical question by the way )

I would like to respond to that rhetorical question if I may ...

I would say the reason he is able to shag so many women is because he gets paid handsomely to do so. Regardless of his big dong, I wonder how many women actually and really truly enjoy being mounted and done by him, that scruffy dude? Probably for the same reason ... the are being paid handsomely.

One other thing that turned me off about him was when I watched him say in an interview that after he gets it up, or has it get up for him, he simply "goes through the motions" and then is able to drop his cookies on cue when the director directs him to.
Since having seen that interview, anytime I should happen to see a Ron Jeremy flick I know there is no emotion and its all "acting" and bullshit! (... which I suppose can probably be said of 90% of porn flicks anyway!)

[Jeff Vader]

Originally Posted by cuzzyman927

I would like to respond to that rhetorical question if I may ...

I would say the reason he is able to shag so many women is because he gets paid handsomely to do so. Regardless of his big dong, I wonder how many women actually and really truly enjoy being mounted and done by him, that scruffy dude? Probably for the same reason ... the are being paid handsomely.

One other thing that turned me off about him was when I watched him say in an interview that after he gets it up, or has it get up for him, he simply "goes through the motions" and then is able to drop his cookies on cue when the director directs him to.
Since having seen that interview, anytime I should happen to see a Ron Jeremy flick I know there is no emotion and its all "acting" and bullshit! (... which I suppose can probably be said of 90% of porn flicks anyway!)

Hmm, after a while it becomes 'just a job' ? He's been in over 1700 movies according to his website (IAFD lists 2100 but some are compilations) so I guess that it could become boring and also there is probably very little emotional attachment.

[Ramblerman]

Spitting,hearing moans groans and screaming that are not the people in the movie. fake gallions of cum, shemales if it's got a dick it's not a FEMALE.

[cuzzyman927]

Originally Posted by Jeff Vader

Hmm, after a while it becomes 'just a job' ? He's been in over 1700 movies according to his website (IAFD lists 2100 but some are compilations) so I guess that it could become boring and also there is probably very little emotional attachment.

Which is why Jeff, I think after a certain age, number of films, or years in the business, or whatever, some should call it quits (or least have the sense to) because the camera has a way and a knack of capturing that "just a job" attitude, which in turn does not make good viewing for porn fans.
That "just a job" attitude/emotion translates into "just another porn flick" for viewers.

[Jeff Vader]

Originally Posted by cuzzyman927

Which is why Jeff, I think after a certain age, number of films, or years in the business, or whatever, some should call it quits (or least have the sense to) because the camera has a way and a knack of capturing that "just a job" attitude, which in turn does not make good viewing for porn fans.
That "just a job" attitude/emotion translates into "just another porn flick" for viewers.

Yes. It just becomes porno by numbers, then again there is so much produced nowadays it's just pumped out (pun intended) with little quality control that perhaps the aim is quantity not quality thus the stars themselves become jaded. Particularly the women who also dance as well, was it Lovette who was working 300 days a year at one point - 150 movies and 150 nights dancing, or something daft ?

[cuzzyman927]

Originally Posted by Ramblerman

Spitting,hearing moans groans and screaming that are not the people in the movie. fake gallions of cum, shemales if it's got a dick it's not a FEMALE.

Totally agree! I believe its called voice overdubbing. I've seen some porn flicks that were so badly overdubbed that the woman's mouth was not even moving and you could hear loud oohs, aahs, and groans on the audio track!
I have even seen a couple of films in which they even used a "cock double" for the extreme close-up shots --- One cock had what looked like a birth mark on it and the other (close-up) did not! It was an absolutely terrible flick! I don't know what the director/producer could have had in mind in thinking that they could fool viewers!

This is why I much prefer the porno industry of old before the advent of all this fancy high-tech audio/video special effects and enhancement gadgetry! Be it good or bad, at least what you saw and heard was the real thing, but most of the time it was good.