Conspiracies

[haroldeye]

My grandfather used to demolish buildings by setting a controlled fire at the correct spot and then getting them to fall in on themselves. Likewise modern demolition experts drop buildings onto themselves using only small amounts of explosives.

[otokonomidori]

Originally Posted by haroldeye

My grandfather used to demolish buildings by setting a controlled fire at the correct spot and then getting them to fall in on themselves. Likewise modern demolition experts drop buildings onto themselves using only small amounts of explosives.

My uncle used to demolish buildings by dropping bombs on them from a great height.

[billybunter]

Originally Posted by haroldeye

My grandfather used to demolish buildings by setting a controlled fire at the correct spot and then getting them to fall in on themselves. Likewise modern demolition experts drop buildings onto themselves using only small amounts of explosives.

Not steel framed buildings. Fred Dibnah used to light a fire to bring down a brick chimney.

[scoundrel]

Originally Posted by billybunter

The 13' hole is at the front. How can an aircraft go through these walls? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T2_nedORjw
WTC7 went down into it's footprint. Fire does not collapse 3 skyscrapers on one day.

Click on my first thumbnail and view a hole big enough for either one of those firetrucks to fit. Correct me if I misunderstood, but I thought you were arguing that the damage was too little rather than too great?

The collapse of WTC 7 arose from the failure of its internal skeleton under stresses it was not designed to support. See this link for a more detailed analysis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

Here are a few images showing the damage prior to the building falling down.


Fire did collapse three buildings in one day, and we watched it happen on TV.

To quote Forrest Gump:

And that's all I have to say about that.

[palo5]

I don't understand 9/11 conspiracy theories, BB

I mean, it's always sensible to question official pronouncements, but if Al Quaeda didn't smash the towers and Pentagon, who did, and what did they gain?

[rupertramjet]

Cant believe we are back to 9/11!

Here is mine:

The CIA had the AQ group under control, they where either leading it, or surveillance was active. The intention being, to arrest them just before they boarded the Aircraft, and say what a great bunch we are.

The AQ lot either got wise to the surveillance, or shook of their minders, went a day or two early and the result we know. Had the arrest been made, the threat would have been enough to start the war on terrorism.

[billybunter]

Originally Posted by palo5

I don't understand 9/11 conspiracy theories, BB

I mean, it's always sensible to question official pronouncements, but if Al Quaeda didn't smash the towers and Pentagon, who did, and what did they gain?

The new world order that is unfolding before our eyes. Al Quaeda is the CIA. Can I prove that on the net no; even if had the evidence you all would chuckle into yer tea. BB what a pratt ha ha.

[rupertramjet]

I also believe it possible that Bin Laden may well have been in US/Pakistani Custody, for many a year.

Why would I think this? Because there where not a lot of 'The Thoughts of Chairman Ossama' videos for a while and if the US Government had said 'btw we got the bad guy', Congress might just have said 'OK so you don't need the cash anymore!'

[rupertramjet]

Anybody, Anybody who challenges the Holocaust, needs only to go to Auschwitz and feel the atmosphere to know it happened!

[billybunter]

I'm wrong you are right believe what you are told, just another brick in the wall.