|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads Post here for all Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
January 24th, 2016, 09:03 AM | #51 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 144
Thanked 14,339 Times in 1,702 Posts
|
The Constitution is not an unmixed blessing. It can act as a straitjacket and prevent actions which would benefit people.
The UK has no Constitution as such yet nobody would pretend that its citizens are less free than their American friends, perhaps they are even a little freer. |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to knobby109 For This Useful Post: |
January 24th, 2016, 10:28 AM | #52 | ||
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 26,268
Thanks: 162,490
Thanked 278,846 Times in 26,213 Posts
|
Quote:
The opening scene features Irene Bullock [Lombard] meeting Godfrey [Powell] on the town dump, where she and her "friends", including her older sister, are looking for a down-and-out to produce as a "forgotten man" and win a scavanger hunt wager. He is openly hostile and chases away the others, but reacts better to Irene because she shows a little bit of humility and self-awareness and grasps quicker than the rest that she should not be doing what she is doing. Because she is sorry, where the others were not, he forgives her and they begin to connect as two human beings. The opening scene is bleakly funny and chock full of the sense of irony which we British always say that you Americans haven't got. For example: Quote:
A good president would give a damn that millions of Americans have fallen so low that they are reduced to living in Hoovervilles. It is legitimate to argue about how to solve the problem or at least deal with it. The conservative view would tend to be that God helps them that help themselves and that the solution should involve offering a way out of such shattering poverty for those who are willing to strive towards a better life. The liberal view would tend to be that people stuck in such abject circumstances must be helped, that we need more social housing, benefits for those who have nothing, and a social safety net to prevent anyone from falling quite this low. The common sense view might be that there is something to be said for both approaches and both ways of seeing, and that an intelligent strategy would accommodate both ways of seeing at least to some extent. But there is no good president who would know that there are Hoovervilles in America on his watch and not feel restless, bitterly dissatisfied, and determined that positive steps to address the problem are needed.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to scoundrel For This Useful Post: |
January 24th, 2016, 10:45 AM | #53 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Land of the free within reasonable limitations
Posts: 10,941
Thanks: 50,626
Thanked 91,418 Times in 10,790 Posts
|
I would argue that the losing battle in the War on Drugs causes more problems than the Constitution in the US. Name another reason why non-Hispanic Blacks commit murder at a rate of 20.8 per 100,000 (2000 DOJ figures), Hispanics at 12.2 and non-Hispanic Whites at 1.86? If it wasn't for the large numbers posted by the Blacks and Hispanics, the murder numbers in the US would be comparable to the UK rate in 2000 of 1.7. If you used only Asian American murder rates, the UK rate would be multiple times higher. (based on the Asian American 1/4th crime rate of US non-Hispanic whites)
I don't think the effect of drugs in the UK has reached US levels, but supposedly it is rising. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2...e-not-addicted Our present may be the UK's future. I do actually feel sorry for the blacks in the US. Most older Asians hate blacks. The US imprisons young Blacks at a rate 10 times higher than whites http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p14.pdf Black males (1,072 prisoners per 100,000 black male residents ages 18 to 19) were more than 10 times more likely to be in state or federal prison than whites (102 per 100,000). This might be a major reason why the murder rate in the US has fallen over the decades. The police have become more efficient in controlling the root cause of murders. A contrary view - http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...-crime/385364/ If a US President could win the War on Drugs, they would be the greatest President in US history. Unfortunately that is apparently a pipe dream. |
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Rogerbh For This Useful Post: |
January 24th, 2016, 04:16 PM | #54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 59,944
Thanks: 1,329,519
Thanked 707,666 Times in 60,118 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to trailmaster For This Useful Post: |
January 24th, 2016, 05:48 PM | #55 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Santee, Ca
Posts: 60,942
Thanks: 282,146
Thanked 815,669 Times in 60,990 Posts
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to SanteeFats For This Useful Post: |
January 24th, 2016, 08:46 PM | #56 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,271
Thanks: 34,207
Thanked 26,794 Times in 2,162 Posts
|
Watched a movie called "Good Kill" this weekend, stars Ethan Hawke as a grounded jet jockey who is now a UAV pilot operating out of a container at Nellis AFB. Story is set in 2010. The pilots all still wear jet jockey gear - flight suits on duty, leather jacket over flight suit driving home. Hawke pulls up at a stop next to a cop who says "How's your war on terror going?" "About as well as your war on drugs.."
As a Brit, it looks like in years to come it will say "Barack Obama, first black president." Not much happening else. Sitting here, aware of his foibles and failings, best President? FDR. |
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Staffsyeoman For This Useful Post: |
March 22nd, 2017, 08:51 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 197
Thanks: 978
Thanked 1,896 Times in 193 Posts
|
Look at it this way...
If the people who have the power to make such a decision, (if they exist) ever decided to put another face on Mount Rushmore, whose would it be? I bet most people would agree on FDR. Three term president, out of the depression, WWII, cusp of the nuclear age, modern America is what it is because of Franklin Roosevelt. Ironically however, if FDR had his say he would almost certainly be against the idea as he apparently left explicit instructions against such monumental commemorations of his person, which, in way makes him all the more deserving.
Last edited by xenontrioxide; March 22nd, 2017 at 08:53 PM.. Reason: spelling |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to xenontrioxide For This Useful Post: |
March 22nd, 2017, 10:36 PM | #58 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Santee, Ca
Posts: 60,942
Thanks: 282,146
Thanked 815,669 Times in 60,990 Posts
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SanteeFats For This Useful Post: |
|
|