|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
November 10th, 2009, 09:09 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 391
Thanks: 431
Thanked 1,843 Times in 388 Posts
|
ID Projects, ID Sheets & ID CSVs ( *** Discussion *** )
hi folks
i want to start putting down some permanent names on models already identified but known under more than one name. these are the first two i want to deal with. i'll say what i think then anyone else can come in with an opinion and hopefully we will come to an agreement. .A, 1296a, Marta, Monica Sales, , aka Thunde .A, 1296c, Gigi, Solange Yi Lon, , Solange Yi Lon has a thread here under 'Solange Hop' and her main entry at egafd is 'Solange Hop' therefore I will change it to that if no one objects. Monica Sales does not have a thread, but is known as 'Thunde' at egafd, therefore i will again change it in the list unless someone has a good reason to keep it as MS. |
|
November 11th, 2009, 03:22 AM | #2 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 201
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,443 Times in 106 Posts
|
Re: Name Changes
Hi Rob
I think firstly you need to decide rules for deciding on which name should take precedence for a models screen name, eg. imdb, egafd, wikipedia, models own website. In an attempt to avoid future arguments as to whick of a models aliases to use. Secondly I think that a csv just listing model names should be constructed (I'm happy to start work on one) proposed format: .SN, Screen Name, Birth Name, Birthdate, Birthplace, Gender, Comments, aka1, aka2, akaN Where "Screen Name" is a unique name we decide on using for the Model (given our naming convention). Birth Name, Birth Date, Birth Place will not be known for many actresses but I see no reason why this information shouldn't be included. Comments can be things like external links to listings in IMDB etc. although this info could be contained in a seperate list? And finally any aliases for the actress This way all publications (image sets, mags, film, and playing cards) can link to a unique name without the current concurrency problems. BB |
November 11th, 2009, 03:02 PM | #3 | |
Ups, i did it again
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,305
Thanks: 6,077
Thanked 23,972 Times in 2,082 Posts
|
Quote:
but I have to disagree to post personal datas like 'Birth Name'. No datas should lead direct to a real person. The CSV should have a static format - all akas should be separated in one cell perhaps with a ';'
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to icu For This Useful Post: |
November 11th, 2009, 04:16 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Treasure Island
Posts: 1,298
Thanks: 625
Thanked 12,848 Times in 1,161 Posts
|
Quote:
This has existed for a long time and I think now is a good time to start using it. The format is very similar to BB's suggestion. Comments should be the last field always. I added the Aliases field today. I have no problem with Real Name, but this could be left blank if people object to it. (Very few real names are known anyway.) The logical Type for Actor is .A and so the existing .A list should be renamed .PA (for Photoset Actor). |
|
November 11th, 2009, 09:55 PM | #5 | |||
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 201
Thanks: 198
Thanked 2,443 Times in 106 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Finally, whatever name is assigned for the ID field should not be changed EVER. |
|||
November 12th, 2009, 09:17 AM | #6 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 391
Thanks: 431
Thanked 1,843 Times in 388 Posts
|
Quote:
however the biggest hurdle and the main cause of the slippage is that egafd/bgafd and even sometimes iafd change the main identification name based on the number of appearances under that name they have listed. this often leads to use of generic names like georgina, tina, etc, etc or names that are different to the most commonly known names. there are also a few that don't appear on the websites eg 'Zoe'@fiona cooper. i agree that once a name is decided it should not be changed but that rule can't stand in all circumstances. for instance i don't think 'Barbara' can be left as 'Tina[16]'@egafd should a more unique identification turm up. i don't think we can get this naming perfect but it does need to be agreed and the only way i can see this happening is to go through each of the names and agreeing the ones that can remain as a permanent id and then identifying the few that may possibly change in the future. we also need to find a way of 'labelling' all the cc classic girls that don't have a current cc classic name. Quote:
http://www.egafd.co.uk/actresses/details.php/id/m0177 |
||
November 13th, 2009, 12:02 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 632
Thanks: 710
Thanked 3,002 Times in 556 Posts
|
Just wondering what the cut-off point is for being described as "CC Classic" because I wouldn't have thought that Lilly would qualify as her sets were published 1989-1992.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dales For This Useful Post: |
November 13th, 2009, 12:22 PM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 391
Thanks: 431
Thanked 1,843 Times in 388 Posts
|
Quote:
There was definitely a stylistic change for the photosets around the early to mid eighties. i think somewhere around there should be the cut off point. i'm happy to take guidance on someone in possession of the magazines themselves to advise on this? |
|
November 13th, 2009, 07:52 PM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Treasure Island
Posts: 1,298
Thanks: 625
Thanked 12,848 Times in 1,161 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
November 13th, 2009, 09:07 PM | #10 | |
Former Staff
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,875
Thanks: 19,210
Thanked 571,062 Times in 11,033 Posts
|
Quote:
But that doesn't resolve the problem concerning unknown model names. -> 1984 = CC Classic 1984 -> = CC Model (?)
__________________
m Please add source, post complete photo and scan sets - with indexes, if available, preserve genuine file names (that will help to ID sources and model names), thank, credit, and quote original posters. I'm afraid I haven't any time for reuploads. Don't send reports (or PMs) of dead files or requests! Once the files posted above are expired, please help each other, add the info I provided as well. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. -> Underlined words in my posts are clickable. <-
|
|
|
|