On the quality of porn - Page 2

**tygrkhat40** · August 21st, 2011, 06:09 PM

It's out there on the net...all you gotta do is look for it.

**OtisOne** · August 21st, 2011, 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepsepia

FTV, in particular, shoots cute girls looking rather like someone you might know . . . Rcommended if the "girl sitting next to you in class" is what you're looking for.

Particularly if - unlikely as it may seem - the girl sitting next to you in your class is also sitting on a 10-inch dildo, suction-cupped to a glass table top.

**deepsepia** · August 21st, 2011, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OtisOne

Particularly if - unlikely as it may seem - the girl sitting next to you in your class is also sitting on a 10-inch dildo, suction-cupped to a glass table top.

Third period honors calculus can get a little dull . . . Girl's gotta do what she has to, to stay awake

**buttsie** · August 21st, 2011, 11:51 PM

To paraphrase porn reviewer Patrick Riley

Anonym zu www.iafd.com/author-result.rme/reviewer=patrick+riley

"it doesnt take long for the fresh facing newbies to lose their looks in porn"
I think that somes up porn to a tee.

College girls by enlarge are smart enough to know that escorting pays better if your desperate for cash and being largely anonymous leaves no trace.A far better risk that making porn with some cashed up punter who now calls himself a producer who will treat you like a rag doll to be used,abused and discarded

Years later that little dabble in porn for a few measly bucks could cost you your current career.
Hardly worth the risk simply to pay the rent while your a struggling student

**deepsepia** · August 22nd, 2011, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buttsie

"it doesnt take long for the fresh facing newbies to lose their looks in porn"
I think that somes up porn to a tee.

I think its much more "how they're shot" than their actual looks.

Too much makeup + fishnet stockings can make any girl look cheap and used. When you see how different the same girl looks when photographed by different photographers, its apparent that most of what you're seeing is production values.

There are lots of cute girls itching to drop their panties for photographers. My all time favorite: "wholesome cute girl": Dawson Miller.

**buttsie** · August 22nd, 2011, 04:33 AM

Dawson Miller who has never made a b/g let alone a solo or g/g film which involves penetration,sucking lollypops aside,doesnt really count in this topic

Softcore tease isnt Porn imho

I'd expect if she'd gone the route of a Jeanie Rivers she'd be looking a bit worn out and jaded as well after shooting 50-100 HARDCORE b/g scenes in a few years.Couple that with those that get sucked into the porn lifestyle.Little wonder the fresh youthful look suddenly disappates

If you look at the casting videos of many of the big name pornstars & glamour models
what you see is beautiful faces but their anything but pristine or perfect like you eventually see in the finished product.

MisterMacky · August 22nd, 2011, 04:55 AM

There is a specific quote from a movie, can not remember which movie however, that has stuck with me over the years. If someone remembers the movie, please step forward.

The quote was from two men arguing over content for a movie in production with in the movie itself. The dialogue went something like "Hrmm... it needs more sex." "What do you mean? She's breaking down in the middle of rush hour!"

I think the quote, for reasons that are all too obvious, speaks for itself in bolstering arguments of women becoming jaded and worn out.

Quality porn means omission of the Heather Brooke and Paris Hilton of this world. A porn star who sucks cock like Homer Simpsons eats a doughnut is not quality porn.

August 21st, 2011, 06:09 PM	#11
tygrkhat40 Long Suffering Bills Fan Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: The City of Good Neighbors Posts: 9,669 Thanks: 304,243 Thanked 153,135 Times in 9,629 Posts	It's out there on the net...all you gotta do is look for it. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

August 21st, 2011, 11:51 PM	#14
buttsie Porn Archeologist Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: earth Posts: 12,714 Thanks: 92,252 Thanked 241,329 Times in 12,746 Posts	To paraphrase porn reviewer Patrick Riley Anonym zu www.iafd.com/author-result.rme/reviewer=patrick+riley "it doesnt take long for the fresh facing newbies to lose their looks in porn" I think that somes up porn to a tee. College girls by enlarge are smart enough to know that escorting pays better if your desperate for cash and being largely anonymous leaves no trace.A far better risk that making porn with some cashed up punter who now calls himself a producer who will treat you like a rag doll to be used,abused and discarded Years later that little dabble in porn for a few measly bucks could cost you your current career. Hardly worth the risk simply to pay the rent while your a struggling student Last edited by buttsie; August 22nd, 2011 at 12:45 AM..

August 22nd, 2011, 04:55 AM	#17
MisterMacky Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 573 Thanks: 1,529 Thanked 4,514 Times in 537 Posts	There is a specific quote from a movie, can not remember which movie however, that has stuck with me over the years. If someone remembers the movie, please step forward. The quote was from two men arguing over content for a movie in production with in the movie itself. The dialogue went something like "Hrmm... it needs more sex." "What do you mean? She's breaking down in the middle of rush hour!" I think the quote, for reasons that are all too obvious, speaks for itself in bolstering arguments of women becoming jaded and worn out. Quality porn means omission of the Heather Brooke and Paris Hilton of this world. A porn star who sucks cock like Homer Simpsons eats a doughnut is *not quality porn. Last edited by MisterMacky; August 22nd, 2011 at 05:02 AM..*

August 22nd, 2011, 04:33 AM	#16
buttsie Porn Archeologist Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: earth Posts: 12,714 Thanks: 92,252 Thanked 241,329 Times in 12,746 Posts	Dawson Miller who has never made a b/g let alone a solo or g/g film which involves penetration,sucking lollypops aside,doesnt really count in this topic Softcore tease isnt Porn imho I'd expect if she'd gone the route of a Jeanie Rivers she'd be looking a bit worn out and jaded as well after shooting 50-100 HARDCORE b/g scenes in a few years.Couple that with those that get sucked into the porn lifestyle.Little wonder the fresh youthful look suddenly disappates If you look at the casting videos of many of the big name pornstars & glamour models what you see is beautiful faces but their anything but pristine or perfect like you eventually see in the finished product.