(UK) Trust the police with your DNA? - Page 4

**mizlaplan** · August 6th, 2011, 06:17 AM

I would be quite happy to trust my DNA in the hands of one of our fine Policeman/women.
I'd be less happy trusting it in the hands of a bad one.
How do you tell the difference?

**deepsepia** · August 6th, 2011, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizlaplan

I would be quite happy to trust my DNA in the hands of one of our fine Policeman/women.
I'd be less happy trusting it in the hands of a bad one.
How do you tell the difference?

Ah mizlaplan, you ask the right question.

And, reviewing our News of the World inquiries, just think what the various nosy reporters could do if/when they get access to what the police have.

In the US, we've already had a truly disgusting story where hospital employees were selling celebrity medical records to tabloids.

The thing is, with DNA, they won't even have to break the law . . . pick up Brad Pitt's discarded toothbrush from a hotel, and you can pick up his DNA.

chitlika · September 30th, 2011, 10:08 PM

Not Fucking likely!

**steve40** · September 30th, 2011, 10:28 PM

put it this way, you would have more of a chance of platting fog than having me trust the police with my DNA.

August 6th, 2011, 06:17 AM	#31
mizlaplan Good show! Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Marches Posts: 2,526 Thanks: 102,983 Thanked 31,901 Times in 2,528 Posts	I would be quite happy to trust my DNA in the hands of one of our fine Policeman/women. I'd be less happy trusting it in the hands of a bad one. How do you tell the difference?

September 30th, 2011, 10:08 PM	#33
chitlika Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 10 Thanks: 3 Thanked 41 Times in 7 Posts	Not Fucking likely!

September 30th, 2011, 10:28 PM	#34
steve40 Vintage Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: here at vef Posts: 824 Thanks: 5,616 Thanked 8,821 Times in 778 Posts	put it this way, you would have more of a chance of platting fog than having me trust the police with my DNA.