Will Jennifer Aniston get naked on film?

[pharoahegypt]

Allegedly, the studio tried begging Jennifer to let them re-edit the topless scenes back in for the DVd release; the theatre release having bombed so badly; but she still has refused.

Other rumours coming via various sources, now claim that because of this her career in big budget movies is OVER...!! Big money was lost on this fiasco; and studios don't like to lose money, least of all in the current climate.

It's taken 4yrs to get a Bond movie out there, and they always make money; so the chances of them funding another Rom-Com loser for Miss Aniston's pleasure is looking somewhere between two hopes........ and Bob's dead..!!!

[pharoahegypt]

WANDER-LUST - NO-BUST..!!!

Here you go, confirmation of how the now infamous scene ended up....


Thanks, and all credit to OP at a certain well known nude graphics site.

[imtrying]

Originally Posted by pharoahegypt

Allegedly, the studio tried begging Jennifer to let them re-edit the topless scenes back in for the DVd release; the theatre release having bombed so badly; but she still has refused.

Other rumours coming via various sources, now claim that because of this her career in big budget movies is OVER...!! Big money was lost on this fiasco; and studios don't like to lose money, least of all in the current climate.

It's taken 4yrs to get a Bond movie out there, and they always make money; so the chances of them funding another Rom-Com loser for Miss Aniston's pleasure is looking somewhere between two hopes........ and Bob's dead..!!!

Why on earth is the studio begging her? She works for them, they pay her salary. What's she going to do, threaten them, tell them she'll never do another rom-com for them? Based on the poor critical and box office reception to the last few of them, that's a risk the studio should be more than willing to take. One more tank job like this and it will be back to television, with maybe a stop at P*****y on the way.

[pharoahegypt]

I agree........ but the world is a strange place today....!!! Back in the day she'd have had to have slept with most of the studio execs just to even get a walk on part..... it's changed a little...!!!?? though ms lohan seems to prefer trying the old way....lol.

[mlc297207]

I agree with everyone, however the major problem is the producers and director casting her and women like her in movies that require nudity, either they hold her to the contract or this will continue and so far she's 2 for 2 {Wanderlust and The Break up} but I agree this latest box office bomb could'nt have help.

[boz2boz4]

It's too bad Jen decided to blur her breasts. Otherwise, she might have saved a terrible movie. And she might have saved a career that is doomed by making meaningless movies.

I actually have a movie plot that will resurrect her career, plus satisfy all of us who are her fans.

She plays a 45ish mother/widow whose early 20s daughter is getting married. The movie starts with Jen in her early-40s on the night before her husband's birthday. She decides to give him an early birthday present, by seducing him as he lies in the their bed. She emerges from the bathroom in a sexy, fully length, near-sheer nightgown. After teasing him verbally for a few seconds, she removes the gown, and the camera pans up as she takes it off.

She shows everything, from her shapely legs, to shaved labia, to a puff of hair on her mound to her breasts, shoulders, and face. The camera focuses on her face, then on her husband, and we see he is slowly looking at her up and down. The camera switches to Jen, and we see her as her husband sees her, ogling every bit of her body as she walks toward the bed.

The rest of the scene is beautiful, mature sex, and Jen shows more of her body, including her ass and labia from behind as he plays with her and she is on top. After an appropriate time, she asks him, "Do you wan to cum on my face?" Of course, he says, yes, and and we get to see not the actual act, but the aftermath, with her face striped six times from chin to the top of her hair.

The point of the scene is to show how loving a couple they are and how active and beautiful they are to each other as they make love. The way they make love, the full range of beautiful and giving sex, is necessary to show the maturity of their love and their relationship, as well as the way they make love.

We then cut to the present, as Jen and her daughter plan for the marriage, talking about what will be done and who will do what. They raise the question who will walk the daughter down the aisle. The daughter exclaims that she misses her dad. Jen just looks sad, so sad she can't speak, with tears filling her eyes. It's clear that Jen's husband has died, not too long ago.

We then meet the groom. To everyone but Jen, the groom is handsome and young, just like the daughter. To Jen, however, the groom is the reincarnation of her husband. She knows the fiance is not her husband, but to her he looks exactly like him, although a bit younger. This is one of the themes of the movie: that she is traumatized by losing the love of her life and projects that onto her daughter's fiance.

To carry this off, and to make Jen comfortable with the sex scenes, her real-life boyfriend, Justin Theroux will be play both the daughter's fiance and Jen's husband. As Jen's husband, he'll look 45ish and with the maturity and confidence that comes with accomplishment. As the fiance, he'll look 22, still not fully mature, reserved, a bit innocent.

Cutting to the chase, what happens next? The daughter becomes seriously ill, the wedding goes on anyway, as the fiance is a very loyal guy. Unfortunately, the daughter dies a few months after the wedding.

Now we enter the main part of the movie, the major theme. I think you know what comes next. Jen falls in love with her deceased daughter's widower, although he is only 23 now and she is 46. The rest of the movies explores their compatibility. There will be none of the trite cliches that we see in other movies about May-September romances, no statements about different music tastes, movies seen by Jen when released and by the daughter's husband on Netflix, not knowing who Ronald Reagan is. The movie will focus on their being in different times in their lives, explained by 20 years of Jen's growing up with her deceased husband.

This point will be driven home sexually when Jen seduces him. He's just not as comfortable with the ranges of sexual gifts that she can give him and those that she wants him to give her. She scene will still be gentle and loving without any hint of exasperation by her or embarrassment for him, but it will be clear that while they are compatible and on the same path emotionally, intellectually, and sexually, he is 20 years behind her and will never catch up.

That is major theme that will require great script writing and acting without words, to show that the only thing that separates them is 20 years: had he been 20 years older, they would have been meant for each other.

And, oh, by the way, Jen will show us lots of her body when she and the daughter's husband have sex. He plays with her breasts, she kneels over him and rubs her breasts over his entire body, from is face to his cock. He'll massage her entire body, front and back. The difference will be she knows what to do. He doesn't know nearly as much, and she has to tell him.

There's my ten cents' worth. I hope one of you is a movie producer and can get this done. This idea for this script is my gift to all of you.

[boz2boz4]

The problem is that actresses like Jennifer Aniston have and make so much money that they have complete independence. Their financial futures aren't tied to the success of the movies, because they receive high guaranteed payments. The producers have no leverage over them. They don't need to work in the future to be secure financially. It's the exact opposite of the old studio days. Can you imagine how much nudity we would have had then from major stars? It would have been awesome.

Is there any hope that the version of Wanderlust screened overseas several months ago will surface, or that someone will leak the original, unblurred scenes?

Originally Posted by mlc297207

I agree with everyone, however the major problem is the producers and director casting her and women like her in movies that require nudity, either they hold her to the contract or this will continue and so far she's 2 for 2 {Wanderlust and The Break up} but I agree this latest box office bomb could'nt have help.

[Sirch]

She was adorable back in the days of friends and the best actor in the series. Her dropping her towel scene while prancing around the apartment was an eye opener for the imagination. Even if we only saw her back and sort of side of one breast.

Regarding today. Really can't say I care to see any women bare all after their 30's. If you waited this long, the fantasy kinda dies. I wanted to see you in your prime. There's something slutty about doing so later in age. Perhaps to rejuvenate a career or sell more BO tickets than you normally do.

But I don't have a problem if she doesn't want to show it all. That's her choice and she has the money to stand her grounds. So good for her.

What amazes me is how this women can work consistently in film for over 20 years and really not have a successful run at it. She defies the old saying "your only as good as your last film".

[pharoahegypt]

no one here is moaning about her deciding not to show her body;;; or they wouldn't be if she didn't keep promising to do so just to put bums on seats in the first place.....!!!!

yes; if she doesn't want to show her naked body; fine.. no problem....!!!

but don't keep telling us you're going to; sell extra tickets; then say "sorry, changed my mind"........ that's just not cricket...!!!

[Sirch]

Can't say Ive really followed her career after friends. So she's been teasing/promising for real, then not living up to the hype?

Originally Posted by pharoahegypt

no one here is moaning about her deciding not to show her body;;; or they wouldn't be if she didn't keep promising to do so just to put bums on seats in the first place.....!!!!

yes; if she doesn't want to show her naked body; fine.. no problem....!!!

but don't keep telling us you're going to; sell extra tickets; then say "sorry, changed my mind"........ that's just not cricket...!!!