Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > General Discussion & News > Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices
Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads Post here for all Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 31st, 2015, 01:12 PM   #91
palo5
Former Staff
 
palo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,579
Thanks: 452,836
Thanked 222,658 Times in 16,567 Posts
palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by knobby109 View Post
The Navy could have forced the Dardanelles as the Turks were out of shells but we didn't know that at the time.
This is a myth - they weren't out of shells at all, as Turkish records show. In fact they had enough ammunition for two more attacks like March 18. Would they have run out of shells before you ran out of ships? ... we'll never know

But it's interesting how the myth appears in so many books. The obvious guess is that the first writers did not check their source, later writers copied the first writers, and so on. It sure looks that way

Could one of the original writers have been Churchill? If so, where did Churchill get his information - Keyes, perhaps? Maybe we'll never know that either

But what if they had forced the Dardanelles? What if they went to Constantinople, told the Turks to surrender.... and the Turks said NO ? Ships can't take cities, and there were no troops with them, so was there a Plan B?
palo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to palo5 For This Useful Post:
Old January 31st, 2015, 01:33 PM   #92
knobby109
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 144
Thanked 14,338 Times in 1,702 Posts
knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+knobby109 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoundrel View Post
In fairness, the Labour Party actually turned the NHS from a vision into a real working service, and in less than four years from a standing start and against deeply entrenched opposition from the BMA. It was a remarkable achievement. But it is true that the principle had been endorsed by all the major parties, Liberals too, and there would certainly have been an NHS if Churchill had won the 1945 election. The trouble is, the Tories had no one with the energy and the relevant experience of Nye Bevan, who was the actual creator of the service we see now, and who had knowledge gained from working with the self-help medical associations in the Welsh mining communities. He had chaired the Tredegar Cottage Hospital management committee for a number of years just after the General Strike and he knew how hospital systems worked. In some areas Churchill's grasp of details was really impressive, but I am quite sure he would have had find someone to deal with creating an NHS for him, just as Attlee did, and who was there on the Tory side with similar credentials to Nye Bevan?
We would have had an NHS whoever had won the 1945 election but the shape it would have taken is another matter.
Of course, after nearly 6 years of war in which government affected individuals more than ever before and did the job of running the country pretty well (look at child nutrition, heart disease rates atc) the public was prepared for a centralised health service. The feeling was that once health care became free, people would use it, become healthier and then the demands on the NHS would shrink. (This mentality still persists in those who think that preventative medicine would ease the pressures on the NHS)
But Labour was initially very reluctant indeed even to take the idea on board.That it did a decent job of it was remarkable.But the money for it came from US aid which was intended to rebuild British industry.
knobby109 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to knobby109 For This Useful Post:
Old February 6th, 2015, 02:12 PM   #93
Rogerbh
Veteran Member
 
Rogerbh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Land of the free within reasonable limitations
Posts: 10,915
Thanks: 50,529
Thanked 91,204 Times in 10,754 Posts
Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+
Default

https://www.yahoo.com/movies/winston...170411602.html This should be interesting.
Rogerbh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Rogerbh For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:52 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.