Quote:
Originally Posted by effCup
What is the actual evidence for that? No, I don't wish to start any arguments it's just a straightforward question. That's a strong statement so what's the evidence for it?
|
Good question, I had a similar thought when I saw that remark...
I had a look at three random issues on VEF, using sweeet's extensive index, and came up with this:
| issue | models | full name | verifiable | refutable |
| January 1980 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| July 1987 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| June 1995 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
The last of these actually had 7 models, but for one model the pics with the textual information have died on the host.
There were no single-name models, either the models were given a full name, or it was a "themed" pictorial with anonymous models.
Of the three wrong ones of the June 1995 issue two were porn stars, i.e. they were not given their porn name in there. Several of the unidentified models were presented as Australian which may or may not be right.