View Single Post
Old October 27th, 2012, 08:16 PM   #22
MrInBetween
R.I.P.
 
MrInBetween's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Gone But Not Forgotten
Posts: 3,934
Thanks: 51,364
Thanked 48,454 Times in 3,898 Posts
MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+MrInBetween 175000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reading67 View Post
I've puzzled over these pics for sometime and can't decide whether they are genuine or not. I'd like to think they are but have my doubts. Any views?
I've never believed that the topless picture in the middle was of Kate Bush, because I thought I'd seen it in the music press a long time before she was famous - meaning she would have been too young. Also the model seemed significantly less well-endowed. These things aren't proof, of course. But this is. An exhibition in London of photographs of groupies, by Baron Wolman, Rolling Stone's Editor of Photography, contains the original picture. It's of one Trixie Merkin, it was taken in San Francisco in 1968, and it has three companions:

__________________

I'm sorry Gentlemen, that's all the lipstick around the nipple we have time for

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by MrInBetween; October 28th, 2012 at 09:58 AM.. Reason: typo
MrInBetween is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to MrInBetween For This Useful Post: