View Single Post
Old June 25th, 2015, 01:11 PM   #9
effCup
Vintage Idiot
 
effCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,131
Thanks: 226,706
Thanked 356,702 Times in 21,626 Posts
effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConstantOgler View Post
"R.B. Kane", with completely different style (90's vs. 70') & maybe even xxx iirc.
I agree. Photographers that had long careers would of course evolve their style somewhat to suit the times/mags/market but I'm not sure it would change terribly dramatically. I'm no expert on R.B. Kane's style but by the 1990s at least some of what little I've seen of her work seemed perhaps rather "raunchy" and "hard", almost prefiguring gonzo-porn? I don't simply or just mean "explicit" but more mannered, unbending, almost focused upon chopped-up body parts rather than mid-1970s-style whole-body beauty. Perhaps even snarling more often than smiling--or am I being too harsh?
effCup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: