View Single Post
Old July 6th, 2016, 08:59 AM   #41
effCup
Vintage Idiot
 
effCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,133
Thanks: 226,710
Thanked 356,735 Times in 21,628 Posts
effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepper II View Post
This seems to be one of those cases where the PH Australia name is actually her modeling name since it is backed up by both the Luke Ford reference and the VHS tape.
Are you saying that a model name published within Australian Penthouse is normally not a modelling name? How? Why?

How many AUPH modelling names are shared by or closely related to those used by The Latent Image?

How many AUPH modelling names are shared by or closely related to those used by Hot Shots (probably Stephen Hicks)?

I asked here quite some time ago for an explanation for the assertion once made that AUPH model names are "notoriously unreliable", but that seems not to have eventuated. Why?

What is the threshold for "unreliability"? Is there perhaps a ratio percentage and if so what is it or what should it be?
effCup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: