Vintage Erotica Forums - View Single Post - Classic Pornstars who belong in the Softcore Section and vice versa

**sandhunter** · May 15th, 2018, 05:23 PM

This thread is to discuss all models who may be in the wrong section

[For the purposes of Classic Pornstars/Softcore Models, hardcore means graphic sexual activity, including vaginal, oral or anal penetration, male ejaculation and some fetishes. Softcore is usually a display of nakedness, often breasts, and sometimes features simulated sex

The convention we use in CP/SM is that if a model has performed any hardcore before the camera, she belongs in CP. This applies if she has performed one act or a thousand]

I have several in mind like Claire Peckham or even ? , and I am sure there are more and after we get some ideas on these models , then we can give them a new home

Claire
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t83...e-peckham.html

showpost.php?p=4432633&postcount=

May 15th, 2018, 05:23 PM	#1
sandhunter Super Draconian Sandhunter Join Date: May 2013 Location: Sonoran Desert Posts: 13,979 Thanks: 208,917 Thanked 261,385 Times in 13,886 Posts	Classic Pornstars who belong in the Softcore Section and vice versa This thread is to discuss all models who may be in the wrong section [For the purposes of Classic Pornstars/Softcore Models, hardcore means graphic sexual activity, including vaginal, oral or anal penetration, male ejaculation and some fetishes. Softcore is usually a display of nakedness, often breasts, and sometimes features simulated sex The convention we use in CP/SM is that if a model has performed any hardcore before the camera, she belongs in CP. This applies if she has performed one act or a thousand] I have several in mind like Claire Peckham or even ? , and I am sure there are more and after we get some ideas on these models , then we can give them a new home Claire http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t83...e-peckham.html showpost.php?p=4432633&postcount=