Quote:
Originally Posted by photoflex
You're right of course, Melvin.
But actors are generally very 'creative' about their background,
and I guess porn actors even more so.
I suppose the article might be written with the information available at the time.
|
Or, even more likely, the article was written without ever consulting or asking Brigitte anything, cobbled together with bits and pieces of info available in other magazines and, for the rest of it, simply invented. As I've written elsewhere in this forum, I used to do freelance writing many decades ago when I was bumming around Europe and on several occasions I was commissioned by agents to invent some interview with a porn star or "backstage reportage" (I've never been on a porn set in my life, but I've "reported" on quite e few
), or things like that. All totally mde up, all total bullsh*t. Who cared? Not the agents, not the editors: Writing for "Big Boner" magazine (or whatever) wasn't exactly a commission to provide an article for the Encyclopedia Brittanica, fer god's sake.
For much the same reasons I'm always amused when some
really devoted fan tries to get "accurate" information about some pornstar they're a fan of. Enjoy them for what they are. Like Annette Haven, who over the course of her career gave several different birthdates, ranging from 1948 to 1956. It's all make believe (Oh, and the ladies
usually don't have real orgasms, either.... Just as in real life!
)