View Single Post
Old September 24th, 2009, 02:06 AM   #686
20late
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 218
Thanks: 2,157
Thanked 2,052 Times in 143 Posts
20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+20late 10000+
Default Dirty Laundry

Quote:
Originally Posted by fondueset View Post
I'm new here. Thanks to all the generous contributors.
I have a theory. ... I believe that the S&S photographers had to supply the suspender belts after 1968 and that many of the pictures feature the same flimsy example.
No doubt the majority of garter belts, stockings and panties were supplied by publishers or photographers - who I'm sure would buy them in bulk and in sizes from one or two suppliers.

For one thing, what girl would willingly want to wear underwear someone else had worn (even if laundered)?

Second, the cost of equipping 30 or so models per year is pretty minimal given the overall sales of 6 or 12 issues per year.

Third, there's the esthetics of the image itself - certain designs work much better for the purpose of photography and men's "interest" than others. If you want to make money selling photos and magazines, you gotta give the public what it wants - simple business economics.
20late is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to 20late For This Useful Post: