View Single Post
Old June 12th, 2018, 04:27 AM   #20
roger74
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 286
Thanks: 3,775
Thanked 7,543 Times in 281 Posts
roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+roger74 25000+
Default

I agree completely Bubba. Candy's beauty simply was not expressed in her PMOM shoot. Only when many years later I saw outtake shots from the same time 1979 did I come to see what a beauty Candy was. I also agree the models should not go back 10-20 years later and pose. Better to have been captured in their prime and remembered that way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bubba420 View Post
Candy Loving comes to mind for me. The original few pics they used in the magazine were very weak. When you look at her complete body of work ( pun intended), she is very beautiful and sweet.

I find the pics of the "Playmate Test Shots" to be among the best for all the girls. The girls are younger, and are not caked with makeup and silly wardrobes.

I don't enjoy when 40 year old playmates are trying to recreate the magic when they pose very explicitly. Let us remember you as a 20 year old!
roger74 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to roger74 For This Useful Post: