As I may have mentioned in the past, what seems to be missing from modern films is the erotic aspect. What is erotic to one person though is sometimes a turn off to someone else, but I get the strong feeling that films are made to a formula which excludes the intended viewer - and that applies to mainstream as well as pornography. Take for example the original 1936 version of King Kong - limited by the technology of the day, but reeking with atmosphere and the sheer erotic charge of the Beauty and The Beast. The latest versions are, imho, overlong and overly effects dependant.
Getting back to erotica though, my turn offs are:
Long plastic claw type nails on the women.
The gross spitting of lubrication in deep throating - in fact, any spitting at all.
Silicone and tattoos.
Those stupid, americanised bondage shoes with heels about 10 inches tall and soles so thick that the wearer looks as if she is in surgical boots.
The total lack of any of the normal foreplay that men and women usually indulge in when getting together. The man says hello and she immediately gets on with fellatio.
This is why I never watch modern porn: I happen to like erotica, and it need not be too explicit. In fact a simple glimpse of a woman's nakedness for a very short time can be very exciting, whereas twenty minutes of pounding is just like watching a butcher at work in his shop!
But there again, I am old fashioned enough to love material from the 1930s to the early 1960s. Erotica was lost as far as I am concerned when porn became an industry.
Margib (a very grumpy old man!)
|