I'm sorry if this has been discussed to death, I don't want to rehash anything, but I've read the thread, and up till now, the discussion didn't make a whole lot of sense, I was completely lost when the argument seemed to be made that we shouldn't post Applegates non-nude pictures because she had breast cancer?
Quote:
|
Where would you draw the line?, seeing an actress in sexy attire such as a bikini or skimpy shorts and top, 17, 16, 15, 14?????"
|
Do you have credible proof that showing such pictures or videos, of non-nude girls, of which there are THOUSANDS on Youtube, will lead to being prosecuted for child pornography??
I draw the line at NUDITY, just like major sites like Youtube do.
Where would you draw the line? Showing the face of under 16 girls, that's distributing child porn?
Seriously, to equate linking to pics of girls in bikinis with "distributing child pornography.", is quite insulting to the actual victims of child pronography.
Also, it's NOT the same.
And please, don't try to muddle the issue here with accusations about anyone liking em young.
My issue is the extremism in your standards and overzealousness. I really can't believe that you really think that linking to a prime-time/day-time show like MARRIED with Children is the same as child porn.
Applegate is always fully clothed in the show, no nipples, no underwear, no bikinis, at most she show legs. if I'm wrong, please point out the specific episode.
If that's distributing child pornography, then all the moms from my Midwestern suburb should be sued, because they all have 12-18 year old daughters who wear skimpy shorts to school.
Let's be very clear: I fully get your rule "do not show pictures of girls under 18, even if they're fully clothed".
What really troubles me is your reasoning behind the rule: You fear to be prosecuted for distributing child porn. So that's weird to me. And to others, it seems, when said girls are fully clothed. Yes, since I don't see police roaming the beaches arresting girls wearing bikinis, bikini wearing girls aren't (Todd) Akin to spreading child porn (pun intended)
