View Single Post
Old August 2nd, 2008, 09:44 PM   #18
karenwhitefan
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
Thanks: 8
Thanked 205 Times in 14 Posts
karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+karenwhitefan 1000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trip View Post
I use an old HP ScanJet 3300C



Within the HP PrecisionScan LT Software,
is a helpful tool called "Descreen Printed Originals / Slow Speed"....

If this is not selected, well that is how those nasty yellow lines appear.
Chroma damage - Horribly lame results.
Everyone must have seen those before, when viewing posts.

Select that option, to get rid of them using this particular device.


==================

After scanning I use exclusively Adobe Photoshop for any or all enhancements.
Currently running versions 4.0, 5.5, and CS.

Unlike many of my old pals scanning for the newsgroups, I do not like the AP 'unsharp mask' filter.
Although it is still something to consider, because it eliminates artifacts, especially in beat up old magazines.

I basically re-position for symmetry, perhaps increase contrast
and a bit of luma, (brightness) but not too much,
and depending on the print, reduce or increase (chroma) saturation.

If the image is not clear enough, possibly add a bit of sharpening.
[Sharpen is still found in filters in AP.]
Again not too much as print already includes reproduction degradation
from the photo-to-print process.

Usually full page images are so large in size that image reduction might be an option.
All in an effort to try and keep it as original as possible.

Original Scan:




Modified Scan:




My work is not professional by any means. It passes as acceptable.
For years I struggled with the basic mechanics, the original image.
If I could get that scanned without damage, that was more than half the battle.

Once the image is scanned acceptably, without flaw in a decent manner, and it is time to process.....
the eye of the artist should not overstate the eye of the photographer.
(i.e.; less is more)


Hello.

I'm a bit late to this thread so I most likely will be talking to myself. Anyhow I downloaded this picture the other night and spent a little bit of time doodling with it.

Scanning and picture restoration is my bag so to speak. Better results are possible with an original scan.

http://img196.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_416lo.JPG

I'll take a look through the messages in this thread and see if there is anything I can add.

Apologies for the picture not showing. It is there though. I have problems with Imagevenue.

Regards.

Last edited by karenwhitefan; August 2nd, 2008 at 09:52 PM.. Reason: Posted wrong link.
karenwhitefan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to karenwhitefan For This Useful Post: