View Single Post
Old August 10th, 2008, 12:45 AM   #23
tertium
Vintage Member
 
tertium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 355
Thanks: 1,430
Thanked 11,852 Times in 354 Posts
tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+tertium 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubinski View Post
Oh Lynda,
What a beauty.

I don't have the Exp0se Oct82 that was requested.
These are out of a H@rvey-Feb83.
They mentioned Lynda on the cover.
Inside, they said it was a scam. Probably so they wouldn't get sued.
Any interest in the text? I can post the full pages, if wanted. No clown noses.
They also printed some reader's responses in the following months.

From what I've seen and read, I think it might really be Lynda.
If it is a fake, I'm pretty sure it didn't come from that particular shot of Colleen Camp.

Wonder if Hef has the original slides. Might have been some different poses.
Pl@yb0y did print some other stills of Colleen when the movie came out.
Would those have been Lynda, if she had stayed in the movie?

Anyway, here are the scans.
Another printing of the Apocalypse Now centerfolds, and one of my attempts at retouching.
Kind of a small print in the mag, but I did what I could.
Wished I had that centerfold from the Expose.
Wow sir! Thank you! Every little bit helps. I for one would love to read what the magazine said. As you may have gathered from my previous posts, I'm interested in every little clue. We may never know the real truth, but if we get enough evidence one way or the other, I think we can make a reasonable guess. I'm still leaning towards "real". If it isn't too much trouble, scans of the text or the entire article would be very helpful. Thanks.
tertium is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to tertium For This Useful Post: