Quote:
|
whatever is deemed enough for a thread
|
ok. not meant serious, but interesting. may some guys remember my special relation to stats, but sometimes they can be helpful
| Forum | Threads in Total | Threads with 2 posts or less | Posts in Total | Posts per Thread Average |
| Classic Pornstars | 2.447 | 216 ( 9% ) | 114.979 | 46 |
| Softcore Models | 6.431 | 2.726 ( 42% ) | 113.413 | 18 |
| Celebs Classic | 3.845 | 303 ( 8% ) | 138.453 | 36 |
| Modern Models | 8.610 | 709 ( 8% ) | 273.780 | 32 |
| Celebs Modern | 2.265 | 266 ( 12 % ) | 87.601 | 39 |
at least it seems clear, that the section which is mainly built on magazine content is already running (and maintained) with a very huge amount of "one-offs" - compared to other sections.
imho there is not any reason at all to disallow new threads just having few content. in none of our sections: beside softcore, ca. 10 percent of all model threads have 2 posts or less! that's not assumed, that's already fact. if you need it even more extreme in percentage, then do the same for 5 posts or less. this will definitly raise some eyebrows
just for fun and not comparable:
| Forum | Threads in Total | Threads with 2 posts or less | Posts in Total | Posts per Thread Average |
| Model ID Request | 8.711 | 5407 ( 62% ) | 34.676 | 4 |
maybe an ** IDEA **:
what about adding a new subforum to EACH model section, called "lesser known models". all actual threads with less than X posts (to be defined) will be moved to this place. it helps to get a simple separation between common / uncommon models and it would be easy to move (mods can sort threads by post count and mark complete blocks of threads for a move, this is 1 minute work which could be done 1 time a month). bookmarks won't get lost when threads were moved.
this would also help the typical "transfer conflict" between the sections.