Thought I'd add a little more about unreliable IDs.
I don't know what problems unreliable IDs cause, but I think ruling them out has problems too.
As long as the unreliable name is a verifiable ID, it shouldn't really cause any problems.
If a better name comes along, the unreliable name will still be a solid AKA.
Reliable or not, names from magazines might still be searched on, so they should be included on the thread as AKAs.
I think unreliable IDs are better than nothing, and if an unreliable ID might lead to more content and a better name, then why should we hold back?
|