Quote:
Originally Posted by effCup
That's true, and has been mentioned to me in this same/parallel context previously. I guess the question I'm asking you is: is your default position one of assumption, or one based on (currently available) evidence? Do you start with the assumption that everyone could have started in the classic era until and unless proven otherwise--whether by d.o.b. info. or implausibility, or whatever? Or do you instead start from the position of: what evidence do we currently have?
|
My position is that I trust the OP is right, until I have reason to believe otherwise. Also, nearly all threads were started before I joined CP, and have been seen many times by other mods, not to mention members, and I trust them too. I don't have an option, really -- it's a question of capacity
In this case, the thread was moved to Classic Pornstars by the then head of Model ID Requests, so my assumptions must be: a) she's been investigated by our best sleuths, b) she did porn, and c) she's classic. That's more than enough for me
However, if you're saying the evidence says otherwise and she's modern, I can ask the Modern Mods what they think, which is what I've done. But I can't move the thread myself because it's their call