View Single Post
Old November 8th, 2015, 08:10 AM   #15
effCup
Vintage Idiot
 
effCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,128
Thanks: 226,684
Thanked 356,630 Times in 21,623 Posts
effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+
Default

I've moved the following here because I think I'd be growled at if I responded in the query thread. Feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepper II View Post
Penthouse Australia is notoriously unreliable with published model names
What is the actual evidence for that? No, I don't wish to start any arguments it's just a straightforward question. That's a strong statement so what's the evidence for it?

I have previously discussed this issue publicly in MIR and privately with some of the MIR mods. so as they may recall I can reiterate some views, but first what's the evidence that AUPH model names are any different from other mags.--mags. of comparable era that is, i.e. 1979-1997? Evidence that means they're "notoriously unreliable"?
effCup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: