View Single Post
Old July 17th, 2017, 11:40 PM   #24
Rubinski
Classic Models Super Moderator
 
Rubinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 58,418
Thanked 133,785 Times in 3,984 Posts
Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LowerCrack View Post
In my opinion: The Chic Magazine February 1979 set is not our model...wrong hair (carpet and drapes), wrong eyes, wrong cheek bones, wrong teeth, and too skinny.
As I said earlier, I'm not on board with this yet.

And we haven't gotten enough feedback on it to settle the issue.

So, I did some more looking and found a couple of photos to compare.
First, from the Chic Feb 1979 layout



And one from the layout linked by LowerCrack above



Eyes, noses, mouths, chins, nipples and areolas all look dam close to me.
Nothing seems to say no.
I was convinced, so I didn't go any further.
Can do more if needed.

I'll post this and hope for a consensus
__________________
Read the VEF rules
Read the section rules before posting that section

Do Not post written thanks in content threads
Instead, Click
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Check your uploads and reup when needed

Dupe uploads (mirrors) in your posts would be great

On images, create a gallery
A mirror image gallery would also be great
Just link your mirror into your post

Use different hosts for mirrors

If you need help, or know a better way
PM me
Rubinski is offline  
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post: