View Single Post
Old 09-29-2016, 09:14 AM   #16
hamham67
Vintage Member
 
hamham67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Merry ol' land of Oz
Posts: 1,064
Thanks: 23,629
Thanked 27,136 Times in 1,066 Posts
hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+hamham67 100000+
Default

To me, if someone puts a great deal of thought, time, and effort into a project, then I see it unquestionably, as "art". Whether their project be a comedic short film, a landscape painting, or bottomless shots of a nude model.
Deepsepia is right, pure art and pure porn are two completely different subjects, but that doesn't mean that porn can't be considered artistic. On the other hand, if woman wants to take topless photos of herself and call it art, that's all fine and good, but she would be wrong to deny it as "porn".

Pure porn constitutes subjects with no artistic input; mass produced photos and videos society gave birth to in its video and digital age.
hamham67 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to hamham67 For This Useful Post: