View Single Post
Old August 15th, 2008, 08:34 PM   #11
JollyHumper
Vintage Member
 
JollyHumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North of the land of Danes
Posts: 832
Thanks: 9,631
Thanked 17,951 Times in 804 Posts
JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+JollyHumper 50000+
Default

I choose to disagree a bit.

My experience with vintageporn (of 60's and 70's) is that they was quite open to bisexuality. Actually I saw my first gay'ish picture in a mag from CC.

A guy with beard sits on the floor and sucks on the dick of the other guy, in some kind of interlude before they continued to shag a famous CC-model, told to be from greenland, tiny, nice face, supposedly started to work behind the scenes at CC.
(Can't remember the mag and although I have pics from the set itself, I wasn't able to track it down. Not allowed to upload from those sets anyway)

These kind of things happened quite a lot in porn from those days.
Today it never happens and if it does, it's porn designated to a bisexual audience.

That's basically what I like about CC and the seventies. The sets looks like a party, hardly see that today with all the piercing, lack of pubic hair, tattoos and no smiling faces.

I'm not allowed to upload pictures, so here's the link to a picture from
@nal s£x no. 3, supposedly published in 1970 or so.

JollyHumper





CC also had gay mags in they're stock. Why shouldn't they be the same quality as the rest of CC (wouldn't know, but it seems logical)

Last edited by JollyHumper; September 24th, 2012 at 05:15 PM..
JollyHumper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to JollyHumper For This Useful Post: