View Single Post
Old June 4th, 2009, 09:02 AM   #39
Art Vandelay
Member
 
Art Vandelay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 35
Thanks: 1,173
Thanked 558 Times in 32 Posts
Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+Art Vandelay 2500+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ignatius J. Reilly View Post
I find it interesting, but not surprising, that no one here seems to be a fan of the "New Playmate" look. Clearly online pornography hasn't helped PB but compare the natural beauty, diversity of appearance, and richness of PMs of years past with now and it is no surprise the magazine has been in decline for years.

I would be remiss without beginning with Lisa Matthews, my favorite, but look at Marina Baker, Julie Clarke, Diana Lee, Roberta Vasquez, Wendy Kaye, Renee Tenison, Shannon Long, Carmen Berg, Morgan Fox (and those legs!)... I could keep going. How many would make the centerfold today? The criteria seems to be: blonde, pierced, tattooed, shaved, and an implausibly fake rack. And then there is Photoshop... Sad.

The only PM I have really flipped over in years was Jennifer Walcott and that was in spite, rather than because of, her implants. Thank God we still have the old days to look fondly upon.

Now get off my lawn.
There have been some nice ones in recent years, but they're rare. There's a recent Cyber Girl named Amanda Adams that may be one of the most beautiful girls I've ever seen in Playboy! Missy Tarrington is another.

Shaving, piercings and tattoos don't bother me, though. In fact sometimes I really like them. I just get tired of airbrushed, tanned blondes with botoxed faces and fake breasts.
Art Vandelay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Art Vandelay For This Useful Post: