View Single Post
Old May 17th, 2018, 04:37 PM   #1046
bowlinggreen
Veteran Member
 
bowlinggreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,192
Thanks: 48,676
Thanked 49,166 Times in 4,188 Posts
bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+bowlinggreen 175000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xyzde69 View Post
Oh dear. You mix everything.
I just mentionned the hypocrisy of the Capitalist propaganda.
  • When Soljenitsyn described the Gulag his voice was pure and perfect for the Capitalist propaganda.
  • When the same Soljenistsyn described the Judeo Bolchevism, his voice was wrong and distorted for the same Capitalist propaganda.

Do you understand my point now ?
How can we trust in Capitalist propaganda ?
Why suddenly all what he wrote about the Gulag would have been correct, (a form of Gospel word) , if he was wrong on the Judeo Bolchevism.
I'm trying to figure out where you get the term Judeo Bolshevism. Some of the old-guard Bolsheviks were what you would call ethnic Jews (like Trotsky), but they were actually trying knock out traditional Jewish culture and replace it with Communism. And later, under Stalin and beyond, things got a lot worse for the Jews. Stalin actually had Trotsky killed years after he fled the USSR.

Your term "Judeo-Bolshevism" sounds like an anti-Semitic conspiracy term, as though all of the Jews were in on it. They weren't.

We might as well call Hitler, who supposedly had a Jewish grandfather, a Jew, if he did.



Quote:
Originally Posted by xyzde69 View Post
By the way you are a guy who wrote to use nuclear weapons on China.
It seems that killing innocent people doesn't disturb you at all.
I wouldn't actually argue for using nukes on China unless they used them first. That would open a huge can of radioactive worms.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xyzde69 View Post
Before the two nuke bombs, Japanese and American governments already knew that Japan had lost the war. I quote the French sources (often taken from American sources) and then I google translated them for you.
The most interesting ones are the last comments in bold by Eisenhower himself.
Japan hadn't "lost the war", they were simply confined to their home islands at that point. Leaving the militarists in power through a cease-fire or a negotiated surrender was unacceptable because they simply would have waited a while and then started up their hostile behavior again. The whole Pacific Rim would be a very unstable place today if we would have allowed such a thing.

Given what they did at Pearl Harbor and some of their subsequent behavior, the morality cards were pretty much swept off the table by the time we had the capacity to nuke them. They made their own karma.

And even so, less Japanese died from the nukes then would have died if we had to launch a conventional invasion of the Japanese Home Islands.
__________________
So much porn, so little time...
bowlinggreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to bowlinggreen For This Useful Post: