View Single Post
Old August 10th, 2017, 12:43 AM   #20
vo1v0d
Hideous By Nature
 
vo1v0d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: sarf eeeest lunden
Posts: 8,244
Thanks: 42,269
Thanked 60,695 Times in 7,461 Posts
vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+vo1v0d 250000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gordian_knot View Post
That's clearly not true, given the hundreds and thousands of buildings that have this cladding, all over the country. Tarting up the outside may have been considered worth doing for its own sake, but the fitting of cladding when renovating buildings as a matter of course has obviously been encouraged by central and local government in order to help reduce carbon emissions and meet emission reduction targets.

If it was for the reason you state, then it wouldn't be so common, nor would it be used in poor areas, when in fact it appears to have been used practically everywhere and on all types of buildings.
The whole point of the cladding is to make the buildings everywhere look better without making any improvements and at low cost. I stand by my original assertion.It looks better so it must be better is the usual perception and misconception.
vo1v0d is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vo1v0d For This Useful Post: