View Single Post
Old February 3rd, 2017, 01:04 AM   #11
buttsie
Porn Archeologist
 
buttsie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 92,252
Thanked 241,293 Times in 12,746 Posts
buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+
Default

Some members already reduce as far as they can before quality loss becomes apparent
because of uploading limitations or simply to keep the files available to free downloaders
because of filehost restrictions.

The TV forums about usually have 3-4 different sizes to cover all bases
If you dont have up to date hardware the upper end is waste of bandwidth


Theres a good article here talking about the new codec versus the old h264
H265 is reducing the size of files by some margin

The cost would seem to be its forward looking

H.265 benchmarked: Does the next-generation video codec live up to expectations?

By Joel Hruska on July 23, 2013

https://www.extremetech.com/computin...o-expectations
buttsie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to buttsie For This Useful Post: