I could trawl through the arguments for a more liberal attitude one by one, but I won't as it's all been said before, many times.
This site has an owner, he lets the mods create and uphold the rules of the forum, we debated the age rule and the consensus was 18, it's much easier for us to police and for members to adhere to.
If you have a picture of an actress aged 17 in a short skirt and a tight top you might well wonder "does this image violate the forums rule?
(This "rule" is for illustrative purposes only. )
Quote:
|
No provocative or sexual images of subjects under the age of 18 ~ non sexual images are allowed
|
You post it as you think it's OK, a mod then hits you with a formal warning for breaking said rule as he views it as a provocative picture.
You get bent out of shape as you think you have been hard done by, you then debate it with the mod as you disagree with the definition of "sexual" or "titillating".
The bottom line is this...
The rule is fairly straightforward to understand for both mods and members alike, it is not going to change no matter what you may think or say, if you do not like this rule I suggest you find another forum that allows such images.
End of story.
__________________
We recommend you use a variety of hosts for your pictures
Read and follow the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
and everything will be sweet.
Use the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
button to show appreciation.
Use the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
facility or the A-Z's before starting a new thread.
Play nice.
If you find any dead images in any of my celebrity posts, please PM me with details.