View Single Post
Old February 3rd, 2011, 04:16 AM   #15
buttsie
Porn Archeologist
 
buttsie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 12,714
Thanks: 92,252
Thanked 241,304 Times in 12,746 Posts
buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+buttsie 1000000+
Default

While i'm on a roll

Foods that get the tick of approval from a supposebly impartial tester
The label of the heart foundation is a good example



http://www.heartfoundation.org.au/si...s/default.aspx

$330,000 buys Maccas(McDonals)the tick of approval

http://www.theage.com.au/news/nation...524026024.html

All testing is paid for by those wanting this badge of health

Turns out the badge doesnt pick out the healthiest products but the least harmful in each category so you have the ridiculous scenario where products with 30-50% of saturated fat(and god knows what else ie unlisted trans fats)with a label that screams healthy

To the smart shopper who understands labels the tick will be useful but the real damage will be those who dont seeing obvious junkfoods as now having a tick that says their healthy

The least worst scenario falls so short of the bar its not funny

Last edited by buttsie; February 7th, 2011 at 07:02 PM..
buttsie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to buttsie For This Useful Post: