View Single Post
Old October 16th, 2017, 09:57 AM   #420
effCup
Vintage Idiot
 
effCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,136
Thanks: 226,731
Thanked 356,783 Times in 21,631 Posts
effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+
Default

Would it be useful for all (long-running) query models, where we have at least a partial or a one-part name, to also have a model thread created for them, in addition to retaining the mir query? That way there'd be:
  1. a mir query to try to resolve their best name, in addition to:
  2. a model thread which would significantly raise the model's profile (mir is a pretty shallow pool, after all) and perhaps thereby lead not only to additional content but also additional information, including possibly a better name?
That is: adopt the same pragmatic pattern as demonstrated here?
effCup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: