As Greenman says, Daniel Craig will certainly being offered a satisfying monetary package in order to sign the contract for the next movie.
Being a long-term James Bond-fan, I have never understood why Craig has been offered the role after Pierce Brosnan resigned.
IMO, Craig is lacking elegance and suaveness respectively whereas his physical aspects (even though being not tall) and gross-motorics are over-emphasized.
Sean Connery certainly had a good mixture of male-ness and elegance, Sir Roger Moore brought in handsome-ness and cosmopolitic behaviour...whereas for me, Craig is just a "bulldozer" and has nothing in common with the figure of "James Bond by Ian Fleming".
For me personally, I could imagine Benedict Cumberbatch to be a "good" Bond.
Some might say, given his past history of playing Sherlock Holmes, he might not fit the role.
However, apart from Sherlock he also played brillantly in other films and when I see pics of him during public occasions (red carpets etc.), I always think: yep, he has something special..call it charisma or aura.
...and he is 6ft b.t.w....which is "minimum-criteria" to play Bond
