View Single Post
Old May 24th, 2017, 12:22 AM   #2730
hound dog
Vintage Member
 
hound dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West Coast of North America
Posts: 1,104
Thanks: 6,453
Thanked 18,732 Times in 1,087 Posts
hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+hound dog 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SanteeFats View Post
Are you sure you got that right??? BLACK voters????
Pack most of a single demographic, in this case black voters, in a couple districts and their votes can't change the outcomes in any of the other districts where your white conservative base holds a slim majority.

added:
All that is needed to carry a district is 50% of the vote plus 1. In fact, any votes received above that number are unnecessary for a deciding outcome. If black voters who lived on the borders with other districts had been incorporated into those other districts instead of packed into the original black districts, the impact in the loss of their votes in those original black districts would be of no consequence to the way the districts have historically voted. But if those same traditional black votes were added to the rolls among bordering districts, their votes might change the historical trends in those district's election outcomes, in this case, district's with a conservative white majority.

Gerrymandering is a way to severely limit the impact of opposition voters by concentrating them into a few districts where they can never achieve an outright majority of seats in a governing body or hold a block large enough to swing a vote one way or another in any other district, and at least achieve some political bargaining power in those other districts.

Last edited by hound dog; May 24th, 2017 at 01:42 AM.. Reason: further explanation
hound dog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to hound dog For This Useful Post: