View Single Post
Old January 10th, 2018, 01:39 AM   #5
Rubinski
Classic Models Super Moderator
 
Rubinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Avatar is NGC1097
Posts: 4,078
Thanks: 58,439
Thanked 133,850 Times in 3,987 Posts
Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+Rubinski 500000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hos View Post
even if the set was posted to Joanna's thread by our famous and reliable member buttsie - i doubt that it's really Joanna.

(direct link to post : http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...0&postcount=43 )
I don't know JC, or the RG, but took a look at this.

I was thinking the RG's areolas were a little smaller than JC's.
Also not seeing several of the RG's spots on JC, or JC's spots on the RG.

That gave me doubts, but then I noticed the note at the bottom of buttsie's post below.

I am late to this party, so I don't know much about JC personally checking the thread.
But if buttsie says she did, that is a bit persuasive.

Also, when buttsie posted the larger set linked by hos above, nobody seems to have complained, and it got a lot of thanks.

So thought I better ask again before sending her to the mystery corner.

If you have an opinion, or see some proof, please let us know.

Cheers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by buttsie View Post

Early simulated teen bg set as a dirty blonde..I should point out there is some doubt that it is her
but given she went through this thread and didnt say it wasnt as she did with another set I'll leave you to judge for yourself



900x 593 x19pics
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...0&postcount=55
Rubinski is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post: