Quote:
Originally Posted by painbrioche
So what is the beef here
These pictures are legitimate, not intimate. They were broadcast in many countries in the world. What are you saying, that her face should be blurred out as she is under-age, or "Married with children" should never be shown on TV again. What about all the magazine photos that are out there. Are you saying that they are all wrong.
where does this pointless panic end. What laws are being broken, other than every picture on this site and every other site on the net are all copyright somewhere along the line. This is panic caused by stupid laws from America, laws to protect children, protect from what exactly. If these pictures are not of a sexual nature then they break no laws anywhere.
A line needs to be drawn here, and that line is that America does not rule the world, and should get of its high horse and sort its self out and leave the rest of the world alone, just like it leaves China alone
|
As I Subscribe To This Thread I Have Read All Of The Above, May I Just Point Out:
1) Its No Longer About Christina (Whose Thread It Is)
2) And More Simply, The Rules Of VEF, Which We Agree To Abide To When We All Join, Clearly State We Can't Post ANY Images Of a Person Under The Age Of 18 Years, Regardless Of The The Laws Of Country In Which The Uploader Resides. That Alone Could Be A Legal Nightmare!
So In Conclusion, Lets Get Back To What Its All About, The Ability To Share Images Of The Beautiful Half Of Creation...
