View Single Post
Old November 21st, 2013, 12:41 AM   #2
effCup
Vintage Idiot
 
effCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,133
Thanks: 226,710
Thanked 356,730 Times in 21,628 Posts
effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beutelwolf View Post
What ever so slightly undermines the Ophelia Richards identification is that the very same magazine page tries to sell us Carole Anne Stevenson as Hussama Yussuf.
Yes, but note that I'm not asking for the model's "real name", just her "most widely accepted" professional alias--a la "Ford Prefect"... as I seem to keep harping on.

I agree it's an obviously made-up name, but aren't all professional names made-up, whether they're "believable" or not? Should we only accept professional names that are also "believable"? Some apparently accepted model ids include the likes of Pattycake aka Patty Cake--is that Patty, daughter of Mr. & Mrs. Cake?--plus various others.

I created this model id request thread to ask others if they know this model by any other names. I suppose I could instead simply have created a softcore model thread for Ophelia Richards & added a link to Pearl, but I think that would be a worse approach? If no other names/ids/pictorials turn up then we perhaps could/should create a model thread, but I wanted to first open the door for any other aliases.

NB, I know/think your comments were not meant critically or meanly, & my response is likewise not meant to (& hopefully does not) sound nasty.

On the topic of "believability" of professional aliases, here's a small (AUPH) selection, the first two "from" Thailand:

Lawan Kamnak
Phuc
& one "from" Malaysia:
Kiara Vandt

Regarding that last, it would appear from this model id request thread that it is not going to be used as an id--perhaps because it doesn't sound Malaysian enough to be believable? Which, BTW, I agree with, but that still brings us back to Patty Cake et al. The real difference is not so much the believability of a name per se, but rather how widely it's used--a test which Patty Cake clearly passes. The problem, then, is with models of whom we only have/know of 1-2 pictorials.

Last edited by effCup; April 7th, 2014 at 10:30 AM.. Reason: typo
effCup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: