View Single Post
Old October 23rd, 2010, 09:01 PM   #1
CaptainYfronts
Member
 
CaptainYfronts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 50
Thanks: 244
Thanked 774 Times in 48 Posts
CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+CaptainYfronts 2500+
Arrow My pet peeve: Actresses who won't do nudity.

This has been kick started from a brief convo in the Helen Flanagan thread regarding her possible future nudity after corrie.

My point was that Suranne Jones was cast in much the same role as HF and since leaving corrie has been in a few "gritty" post watershed adult dramas with sex scenes and has disappointed on every occasion.

Why do they keep casting women who won't do nudity in roles that practically require it?

How realistic is it for there to be a sex scene where the woman is desperately keeping her tits covered like her life depends on it?

You can't have gritty drama portraying supposed real life all thorough a program then do all the sex scenes fully clothed or tits covered at all times.

I'm not expecting hard core porn on the BBC or anything but in my opinion to be remotely realistic sex scenes require some amount nudity and women who refuse to do nudity shouldn't go for roles that may need it.

/end rant.

Last edited by CaptainYfronts; October 30th, 2010 at 08:46 PM..
CaptainYfronts is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to CaptainYfronts For This Useful Post: