View Single Post
Old November 25th, 2017, 04:46 AM   #3
ballyhoo
Veteran Former
 
ballyhoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,292
Thanks: 66,717
Thanked 151,872 Times in 4,255 Posts
ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+ballyhoo 750000+
Unhappy these pics are not Audrey Hepburn

Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzzyman927 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomesing View Post
I’ve been looking around for proof of any such photos, and I didn’t find any.
here’s one Pinterest post, and another post doubting the validity of the pic(s).



I also saw the photo credit going to a photographer named Andre de Dienes.
as far as providing some evidence, I’ll just state what seems obvious to me;

Audrey was very thin. like, really thin. look at her body in this image I reupped.
there are better examples of her general build. (like torta’s post above, #144)



the model(s) in the nude pics are fuller & bigger than Audrey in almost every way.
no nude pics exist in this thread. btw, is there any solid proof that it really is her?

sorry, yes it’s just my opinion. but I think I’m right here. I just don’t see it.
ballyhoo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to ballyhoo For This Useful Post: