Quote:
Originally Posted by effCup
So, just check to whether I've followed your info.: you're saying that more men reported having sex with animals than women reported trading sex for money?  Yet it was the latter you said was (to men, anyhow) shockingly high. Is that because men aren't as shocked by the behaviour of other men as they are by the behaviour of women?
Yes, OK, the number of men who trade money for sex probably doesn't relate exactly/linearly to the number of women trading sex for money, but there will still be an approx. ratio/similarity.  |
No, the number of men who had traded sex for money was fewer than the number who had sex with animals. We are talking roughly one in five or six.
The number of women who had traded sex for money was well over half and may have approached three out of four.