Vintage Erotica Forums - View Single Post

**teaktop** · April 17th, 2015, 02:01 AM

A model's own site is an "interested" party/publisher. She/they may not wish to divulge all of her appearances/content/model aliases, info. etc. in that context. Something similar can arguably be claimed regarding a photographer's or studio's index of models--e.g. I've seen in other places discussions of whether photog. X is prepared to "admit" responsibility for certain image sets that may be financially entangled with/by other parties,

thank you guys for your reply ,i ref effie here and points I overlooked ,pepper I will send link cant remember her name right now ,but in saying all that ,it may be quirky Im not looking for kudos on solved I like playing Sherlock Holmes ,I get a kick outa it
thanks again for your replies ..btw but best site ever ,and not to go overboard I really enjoy this community

April 17th, 2015, 02:01 AM	#18
teaktop Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 7,057 Thanks: 54,282 Thanked 117,198 Times in 7,076 Posts	valid points A model's own site is an "interested" party/publisher. She/they may not wish to divulge all of her appearances/content/model aliases, info. etc. in that context. Something similar can arguably be claimed regarding a photographer's or studio's index of models--e.g. I've seen in other places discussions of whether photog. X is prepared to "admit" responsibility for certain image sets that may be financially entangled with/by other parties, thank you guys for your reply ,i ref effie here and points I overlooked ,pepper I will send link cant remember her name right now ,but in saying all that ,it may be quirky Im not looking for kudos on solved I like playing Sherlock Holmes ,I get a kick outa it thanks again for your replies ..btw but best site ever ,and not to go overboard I really enjoy this community __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.