View Single Post
Old November 14th, 2017, 01:47 AM   #66
effCup
Vintage Idiot
 
effCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,133
Thanks: 226,710
Thanked 356,730 Times in 21,628 Posts
effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+effCup 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponky View Post
It is better to continue here.

If decision to mark ID request as solved with XNK (or similar) code stays, I would suggest that users should have option to open a new ID request in search for better name - like when some opens request for other names or with "name A @ site B", etc, we have lot of such examples. This way at least we could collect and organize informations as in some pending model thread.
I quite agree. I still fail to see what marking these queries as "solved" actually achieves?

If they remain open then additional content can be added. I think folks have agreed we don't want to see model threads started with names such as X000, etc. Or is that not the case & people do want to see such?

Should they be moved to PMT? Pending a "usable" name, that is? I'm not saying that's my wish, just... trying to understand.
effCup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: