I think Rubinski's made a pretty convincing case. I'm not very familiar with Jody so my first impression was largely swayed by Charleene having larger boobs/better condition/weight generally--some idiot must have told her to go on a diet?
--& I suppose just my general scepticism.
A lot of her pics. are either not high-enough resolution, or perhaps have had various spots removed, but here's a couple more that seem to match the one Rubinski noted--the first almost obscured by her hand:
Quote:
Originally Posted by scooterbc1998
|
The areolae here look pretty similar to those in the pink towel shots:
Quote:
Originally Posted by himmelsta
|
The pink towel shots both show a smaller spot in the valley between her boobs and there's also one on her left neck, but those are perhaps too faint/small to show up in other pics. /shrug/ It's ex's call but I'd say it's a credit to Rubinski.
BTW, I know what Rubinski means about not wanting to determine an id just from a mole/spot, but to me they can be more convincing (harder to fake/misinterpret--except when they've been removed) than someone simply saying her face matches, etc.--e.g. Jeanette Dyrkjaer has a tell-tale spot on one areola.