Thread: Holly Madison
View Single Post
Old May 25th, 2016, 08:34 PM   #25
keats
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 501
Thanks: 1,076
Thanked 11,361 Times in 527 Posts
keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+keats 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marialva View Post
There's no need to be angry. My guess is far from absurd or ridiculous. But of course, if you want to take the words out of context, then everything is possible.
Actually your own objection makes the point. Start with context: Don't Terri Welles' comments have to be put in context? She has a long history with Playboy including a period of conflict and litigation. What was the context of her remark? Then there's another context: How can she possibly "know" this about ALL the PMOYs? Does her list include Eugena Washington? Or Claire Sinclair who was in a relationship with Hefner's son? The conjecture is, it seems, absurd and ridiculous. What could possibly justify jumping to conclusions about Ms. Edmondson when she has done nothing to lead to those conclusions? Obviously Hefner was involved with some, maybe even many, PMOYs but aren't the women entitled to their own biographies? If they say they were involved then that's that, but if they don't then what's the percentage in making guesses that in no way can be either proved or disproved and adds nothing to the pleasures they have given with modeling? I should add that Hefner claimed that he was "faithful" while he was married to Kimberley Conrad so that also adds another "context" to whatever Ms Welles said. The bottom line is that speculation is pointless at best.

Last edited by keats; May 25th, 2016 at 10:08 PM..
keats is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to keats For This Useful Post: