View Single Post
Old September 2nd, 2017, 02:03 AM   #20
palo5
Former Staff
 
palo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,579
Thanks: 452,836
Thanked 222,658 Times in 16,567 Posts
palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xyzde69 View Post
I'm sorry if I wrongly understood when you wrote that the KGB .... only monitor and record 300 lines at a time. and then asked: "would you prefer the NSA system that can log all details permanently, or the KGB system with its great limitations?"

I understood that like the KGB was not as efficient as the NSA.
Ok, but there's a 30 year time difference. The West was saying we were listening to everyone, when in fact we weren't. That was when USSR existed, which was a long time ago

The technology available today is digital, not analog. That's how we all communicate now, and why NSA (and everyone else) in theory can capture so much more

The point is, the West was lying about us listening to everyone. They wanted to make us look bad. But now the technology exists to do it for real, they use it themselves and their hypocrisy is exposed
palo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to palo5 For This Useful Post: