View Single Post
Old July 26th, 2008, 07:12 PM   #10
fannatastic
Veteran Member
 
fannatastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Treasure Island
Posts: 1,298
Thanks: 625
Thanked 12,841 Times in 1,161 Posts
fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+fannatastic 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Gebra View Post
@ fannatastic

Just to understand what you're proposing an ID example:

14f, CG, Musical Seduction, 22, TS05.3
14f, Hanne, Hanne(CC)
14f, Yvonne, Uschi(CC)
14f, Trine, Mikki(CC)

Is that ok?
Yes, except I prefer:

14f, CG, Musical Seduction, 22, TS5.3

Quote:
What's the advantage of separating Story/Mag ID from Actress ID by extra lines?
The advantage of separating them is that the number of fields is always the same (five and three), no matter how many actors/actresses appear in the story. This would not be true if everything is in one line. It is important for the CSV files to have a fixed number of fields.

The disadvantage is that it is not possible to tell from the first field (CC Set) if the entry is CC Set-Mag or CC Set-Actress. Therefore, the two must be kept in separate files. A solution to this problem is to add another field at the beginning, e.g. A for actress to CC Set-Actress, e.g.

A, 14f, Hanne, Hanne(CC)

But what letter(s) to use for CC Set-Mag? M/F/V are no good, because these are needed for the mag/film/video section of our "complete CC" database.

With a new prefix, the data could be stored in the same file.
fannatastic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to fannatastic For This Useful Post: