Scandi Delights - discussion
 

This thread is for discussion of matters relating to the Scandi Delights id project thread. Please post any discussion/comments/etc. here and not there, thanks.

82/83 is Helle Kjaer

0143 is also this:
https://t16.pixhost.to/thumbs/338/62...22013_0000.jpg
She might be Leila Vigso

000171 might be Jane Warner, hard to tell

000205 is Pia Fris

2501 is Tina Preston
2528/2530 is Claire Margarson

001184 is Pauline Lee

001364/5 seems to be Trine Michelsen

Firstly: I recommend downloading the text file(s) linked in the thread & import them into a spreadsheet app (e.g. MS Excel, OfficeLibre Calc, google docs, etc.). A great many models are already named. That will help save some of the eyestrain.

2528 is Maria Berggren (aka Amy Bishop). That's what the doc. says but also I recognised her, i.e. a known set of hers--see some pics. from Model Directory in her thread.
I haven't got round to checking it yet but 2530 is listed as Claire Margarson and I don't doubt you.

Secondly: don't rely upon the model ids given in the text docs. A great many are probably correct but I've already been burnt by a couple that were not/I wasn't sufficiently careful about.:o:rolleyes: So: eyestrain not entirely dispensed.:(

I don't envisage needing to spend too much time id'ing many of the models as a consequence. Maybe we'd be better to devote more of our attention to: a) those that are incorrectly id'd b) those for whom an id is not already known/we don't recognise? /shrug/ Just a suggestion.

Not all sets numbered/listed are present.:rolleyes: There are gaps.

Sorry, I didn't read all the text, and failed to spot the existence of that file. I only noticed that images were identified within the picture.

https://t16.pixhost.to/thumbs/342/62...arson-2528.jpg https://t16.pixhost.to/thumbs/342/62...tsheet_016.jpg
I was referring to the one on the left, not the right. Even in the text file there is a reference to Margarson as 2528:

922 2528 CLAIRE MARGARSON 91 "beach and rocks, red bikini, eating fruit. British dark blonde"

It's very frustrating about the original source that leading 0s make a difference.

Yes, sorry. My bad. Excel stripped the leading zeros from the file as I was organising it.:o Do I need to re-do the text to preserve all the leading zeros?:( That would be a right pita because although I have the original text the leading-zero-stripping happened right at the beginning of the process, i.e. I'd have to re-do all the formatting, cleaning, etc. Yikes.:eek: I'll say no for now but... maybe later, maybe.:(

Try highlighting the relevant column in Excel and formatting it as plain text. Although Excel assumes it's a number when importing, it usually retains the whole string and just defaults to number format.

If that doesn't work, try editing one of the number fields adding ' at the front and see if it displays the leading zeros.


Regards

40+

The original text is just that: text. It is not (properly) delimited. It is not columns (at that stage). If I go back to the stage where Excel first encounters the text & (wants to) strip the leading zeros, then I'm losing an awful lot of "tidying" & formatting of that text. I used some regex prev. but a lot of the text is too "loose"/irregular for that to cover all the formatting/cleaning required.:(

I know, "plan to throw one away..."
Fred was Right, said Fred.

Perhaps I should upload the original (un-cleaned) text, so you can see it yourself... & perhaps have a go.:)

It might already be known that @ Pinüps.dk, there are photoset references(with no 2-letter prefix code) that have 4 digit codes and some that have 6 digit codes. Some of these photosets are the work of Allan Sass. However there some of these photosets that are the work of other photographers that would usually have a 2-letter prefix code proceeding the numbers.

For example: The work of Jean Rougeron @ Pinüps.dk usually has a 2-letter prefix code of JA proceeding the numbers of the photoset reference. Photoset reference 002840(Ruth Gleeson's photoset which is presumably the work of Jean Rougeron) has no 2-letter prefix code proceeding the numbers. There are other examples of the work of Peter Flodqvist(which usually has a 2-letter prefix code of PF proceeding the numbers of the photoset reference) has no 2-letter prefix code proceeding the numbers.

--

Something that also might already be known about model names; a model's name credited to a photoset(@ Pinüps.dk or elsewhere) may not always be her most known name. Sometimes the name a model was using at the time the photoset was taken is the name attributed to the photoset. The name a model is credited as @ Pinüps.dk may be different that the model's VEF thread title name.

For example: Anna Karlsson(Pinüps.dk) AKA Lorna Mayfield(VEF)

[Wasn't sure if this project was for ID'ing the unknowns @ Pinüps.dk and/or for known models(with perhaps different AKAs) who have content @ both VEF/Pinüps.dk, so feel free to remove if necessary]

---

Pascale Vital @ SässPhotography/Pinüps.dk:
(1 photoset from Jean Rougeron - JA0011)

(JA0011_0 - JA0011_4)
http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/5f/0f/42...6731408303.jpg http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/e7/3f/b7...4731408323.jpg
http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/9f/0f/fe...0731408333.jpg http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/e7/11/91...1731408343.jpg http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/91/a5/8e...5731408353.jpg

And here she is @ VEF...

As Conny with pics posted by svga and referenced by effCup:
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...0&postcount=23
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...7&postcount=60
As Fleur de Lis'e with pics posted by martsm and referenced by johnmcwhatsit:
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=180
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...2&postcount=50
There are also several posts @ VEF with name references of Pascale Vital, however I'm unsure if she is the same as the model listed @ Pinüps.dk. (she is mostly wearing sunglassses in her Jean Rougeron photoset)

Re. the loss of leading zeros (due to Excel):

I've been re-looking at the raw data & have improved my regular expressions so that it'd be a bit less manual work to re-do the data into columns (mostly), but the thing is that I think the only way to prevent Excel stripping the leading zeros is to put a ' before them, and unlike where one does that manually within Excel, if I do that to the text file prior to importing into/opening with Excel (that's the only reasonable/manageable way, given the quantity), then they remain visible within excel. That is: Excel then doesn't treat them as "special" characters.:rolleyes: So: that way keeps the leading zeros but also prepends a '. So I still wonder whether it's really worth all the effort of re-doing the data?:confused: