If you're trying to paraphrase what I said you got it completely wrong. What I said is that the preponderance of evidence in the bio of Donna Edmonsdon makes the claims made above extremely unlikely. Once again I ask, how is possible that the story has held for all these years? Anybody can believe what he wants but gossip is just that, gossip; usually gossip carries its own motives.

Can we not try to slang her for whatever past she did or didn't have and just stick to fapping over her, please??

You need to reread what I wrote. I was agreeing with you. The story about Donna Edmondson has no merit, as it was told by someone who not only has an ax to grind, but has no proof, or even the ability to provide any. At the same time, what Donna Edmondson said about herself doesn't need proof to be believed, as she's the one that would know what the truth is.

Please forgive my misreading; we live in strange times when it's getting harder to figure out what anybody is saying about truth

Same lingerie as Karen Velez?
 

Just wondering if anyone else thinks that this is the same piece of lingerie?

http://img160.imagevenue.com/loc4/th...06_123_4lo.jpg http://img159.imagevenue.com/loc175/..._123_175lo.jpg

Over the year several articles of clothing have circulated through various shoot as have numerous props and setting. Locations too, especially a farm where many playmates were shot. Of course there was that fur throw or rug or whatever it was that one photographer in particular favored. It was Cara Zaraleta who revealed that the wardrobe recirculated; she was going through lingerie on hangers and pointed out that the drycleaning tags meant another model wore the garment and she (Zara) avoided those. As for these two pictures; from the way they're draped they look different to me.

Big thanks to cuyler3329 for this YouTube vid. I love Donna's bubble-headed bimbo voice, and looking at her big tits about to fall out of her dress. I could get hard hearing her read the phone book.

One thing though:

"I'm still a virgin, I still feel like I'm sexy," she says. Ah ... look, we can buy into the virgin playmate thing because that's fun and erotic. But as PMOY? I'm calling BS. No woman becomes PMOY without riding Hef's baloney pony.

Is it necessary to drag Donna through the mud? She had an awful time for a while when she became PMOY because of the whole virgin thing. I actually lived a couple of miles from her for a few years, and it seems like she's quietly living her life now. I don't think she ever regretted posing, but she's chosen to lay low on social media and have a normal life and that's her choice.

Donna seems quite sincere when she says "I'm still a virgin". And probably she wasn't the first virgin Playmate. Most of the girls weren't sluts or followed Teri Weigel's footsteps into porn. Some of them even went in the opposite direction and disappeared from the scene, like Justine Greiner. In some interviews, Karen Price (which I believe was also a virgin) made it clear that she was a very modest and conservative girl. So, given her background, it's reasonable to think that Donna Edmondson was still a virgin.

We've already discussed this in this thread. The woman who said this has an axe to grind against someone at P***boy, probably Marilyn Grabowski. She made this claim without proof, and many/most of the P***mates that responded to the claim denounced it as false, including Donna Edmondson. Thus the idea that a model cannot become a PMOM or PMOY without getting boned by Hefner is the more likely BS here.